![]() It is regarded as a deceptive practice to fool a buyer into paying a little more for a gun than it might be worth, or to make it look just a little nicer than the one on the next table at a show. The bottom line is that the gun was fine the way it was and should have been left alone. Maybe not totally because those old guns were pretty stout but who wants to take the chance on a utility gun like that? The fact of the matter is concentrated high heat has been applied all over the surface area and could have created multiple brittle spots where a crack or catostrophic failure could ocur at any time while shooting. That gun is torched and is now potentially unsafe. I have been watching this thread and have been amused by the banter and was hoping to see some others join in the of support LeroyBeans, since he is right. No sense in losing some figures or worse over it. Ed,ask people that actually know something about old double guns and gun restoration. Sadly, Ed may even hurt himself or others with that gun. You can't admit you don't know what you are talking about. They must have zero luving corksuckers on that forum. Http:/ / forums/ ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=1&page=1 It is not the restoration that devalues it so severely, it's the torch. A half dozen guys will tell you that it was torched and now worth nothing and is possibly hazardous to shoot. Post those pictures over on the doublegun forum. ![]() I guess he hasnt tried buying any restored 67 vettes. ![]() ![]() He was once told by a kid that restored originals arent worth a damn and believed him. Yep, i will buy those he has like that with a 3 in front of double zeros. Its value is next to zero.ĭoes being an come naturally to you, or do you have to work at it?ĭo you have any comparable shotguns you'd sell for "next to zero"? ![]() I am sorry to have to tell ya, it has been torched. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |